Budget blues make commissioner see red
By JoAn Bjarko
North Forty News
It's a battle of numbers in Larimer County government these days, following
an exchange of verbal volleys between the sheriff and the commissioners
over who gets and spends the most money.
A public display of budget discord erupted Aug. 7 at the county fair when
Commissioner Glenn Gibson came upon the sheriff's department distributing
a letter complaining about potential budget cuts. Gibson put a stop to
handing out the letter throughout the fairgrounds, but the sheriff's department
was allowed to continue distribution from its information booth.
Gibson said later that he was not trying to censor the sheriff, an elected
official, but he is concerned that other elected officials don't have the
same lobbying opportunities.
"The midway is not the place," Gibson said. "I asked for it to stop, and
he stopped."
In the letter, Sheriff Jim Alderden said his department is understaffed
by 21 positions in patrol and investigations when compared with similar-sized
Colorado counties.
Alderden contended that his department has not received funding increases
that were promised when voters "de-Bruced" the county in 1999. That vote
exempted Larimer County from the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights authored by
anti-tax activist Douglas Bruce. When de-Brucing was presented to voters,
county officials said funding priorities for the extra dollars would be
law enforcement, public facilities, roads and bridges. That commitment
was not in the ballot language itself, however.
Commissioners Gibson and Tom Bender were not in office in 1999, but they
both said they have honored the funding commitment. Commissioner Kathay
Rennels, first elected in 1998, also defended the commissioners' actions
toward public safety funding. The county has laid off about 70 employees
in the past two years, but Rennels noted none of those came from law enforcement.
Tax income
It is difficult to calculate what may have happened had voters not supported
de-Brucing. County budget manager Bob Keister estimated that the county
took in $41.5 million more in tax revenue in the last five years than it
would have with the TABOR limits (about 7 percent annual increases) still
in place. The county population grew 37,000 in the same period.
Large annual increases in the tax base are history, however, Keister said.
Property values in Larimer County are leveling off, he noted, with the
2005 increase in value at 2.59 percent. Annual increases in taxable value
peaked in 2000 at 17.8 percent.
Larimer County is looking at more layoffs next year, said county manager
Frank Lancaster. "People will be losing their jobs in this budget," he
said, "but we will certainly try to do as much as we can by attrition."
Keister explained that current projections show the county will collect
$1.7 million more in property taxes next year. If the sheriff runs exactly
the same program next year, for example, it will take $2.2 million just
to cover the usual increases such as employee raises and jail operating
costs.
Sheriff's budget
Alderden's letter warned county residents that he will have to reduce
law enforcement services to meet the commissioners' request for a list
of possible budget cuts totaling $1.5 million. Cuts, though fewer, he said,
will still occur if the department is limited to a 3 percent increase -
the upper limit commissioners have set for the portions of budgets that
rely on local tax support.
At a community meeting on Aug. 16, Alderden said cuts of 5 percent could
result in 30 layoffs. Alderden asked his audience to recommend what cuts
should be made, but instead received support for all of the services in
place.
"The sheriff's department is an agency that takes care of so many people,"
said Barbara Trevarton, manager of Cloverleaf Mobile Community on East
Mulberry. "I can't imagine a service you could cut."
Responding to the sheriff's criticism, the commissioners stated on Aug.
17 that many of Alderden's complaints are inaccurate or misleading. "The
sheriff's department has received more than 2.5 times as much additional
funding (from discretionary tax revenue) as any other county department,"
the commissioners said. "... From a staffing perspective, growth in county
employees has been almost exclusively in the public safety area since 1999."
The county groups the sheriff's department, district attorney's office
and the coroner's office as the "public safety" component of the county
budget. Together, their equivalent of full-time employees has increased
75.25 since 1999. Public safety is allocated $42 million in this year's
county budget compared with $16 million for general government.
Budgeting dilemmas
In Larimer County, the commissioners set the budgets for each department,
including those headed by other elected officials. The commissioners have
to approve each new permanent job position, but department heads otherwise
have wide discretion on how to spend the dollars in their budgets.
Earlier this year, the commissioners asked each department to develop a
menu of cuts that total 5 percent of their budgets that are supported by
county tax revenue. Some departments - such as solid waste - are totally
supported by fees. Other departments - such as health - rely heavily on
state and federal funds, grants and fees. For example, Dr. Adrienne LeBailly,
director of the county health department, said her menu of cuts will total
$118,430. About $2.3 million of her $7 million budget is supported by county
taxes.
It's the county manager's job to give the three elected commissioners a
proposed balanced budget by Oct. 15. Lancaster said that he will have three
lists of numbers to work with: budgets based on a 3 percent increase, a
list of prioritized cuts from each department totaling 5 percent, and a
wish list of projects the county would like to fund. If the county chooses
to fund something on the wish list, the revenue will come from something
on the list of potential cuts. In effect, one department's cuts could fund
another department's needs.
For example, Lancaster said, it will cost the county $600,000 a year to
improve how suspects are handled between the time they are arrested and
when they are convicted or released. A better pretrial system could reduce
costs at the detention center, however, and postpone a jail expansion,
he explained.
Lancaster also has to devise how to fund increases in employee health insurance
premiums. PacifiCare is asking for a 26 percent increase, but Lancaster
said he hopes to negotiate a lower figure. Larimer County pays the total
premium for its full-time employees, but not for their families.
The county also wants to upgrade its retirement benefits to be more competitive
with other employers, Keister said.
Larimer County has a bright note, however: healthy general fund reserves.
The county used $3 million in reserves to balance the '04 budget. Over
the next several years the county could tap into $12 million and still
have enough reserves to protect its bond rating. Lancaster said he anticipates
using about $3 million from the reserve fund for the '05 budget.
"I think that frustration has been aired and that now we can work toward
a good budget," Rennels said.
Budget hearings
County commissioners will take comments on the county budget and spending
needs anytime. "Typically people don't comment until their project doesn't
get funding," Lancaster noted.
County residents will get their first look at spending for 2005 in mid-October.
Budget hearings are set for Nov. 22 in Fort Collins and Nov. 23 in Estes
Park. Comments can also be sent to the county's web site at www.larimer.org/budget/survey.htm.
Commissioners have until Dec. 17 to make final changes.
Looking toward a future of tight budgets, Gibson said he believes in the
next few years the county will have to ask voters to approve a combination
of sales taxes and property taxes to fund public safety, especially increases
for the alternative sentencing unit, which gives low-risk offenders an
option to spending time in jail.
"We're not going to the public (for tax increases) until we have done everything
we can internally," he added.
|