NFN & FCC full masthead 2005

October 2005

Events News Archive Home Page About Us Advertising Info Community Page

Referenda C & D at a glance

By Dan MacArthur
North Forty News

It's no simple matter sorting out mind-numbing numbers competing campaigns are using to make their case for or against Referenda C and D.

The numbers certainly are important and some no doubt will find them compelling. But the real bottom line for many voters will be whom to believe.

Is the additional revenue essential to relieve the state from a devastating financial crisis? Or is it simply a huge tax grab to keep feeding a bloated government bureaucracy?

The ballot language, contained in the "Blue Book" mailed to every registered voter, is relatively direct. The real debate is in the interpretation.

The text states that the referendum would not result in a tax increase. But opponents challenge that retaining billions of dollars that otherwise would be returned to taxpayers effectively represents a record tax hike.

There are also deep disputes about the actual dollars involved. The nonpartisan Legislative Council estimates passage of Referendum C would cost every taxpayer an average $491 over the next five years that otherwise would be returned through a sales tax refund. Opponents have countered that it would take $3,000 out of the pockets of an average family.

The accompanying stories further examine some of the issues on both sides of the debate in an effort to help you decide for yourself.

Here's a quick summary:

  • Referendum C asks voters to suspend for the next five years refund requirements contained in the Taxpayers Bill of Rights. Approval would allow the state to keep an estimated $3.7 billion that would otherwise be rebated to taxpayers under TABOR. That money would be earmarked to finance health care, transportation projects, education and related capital construction projects, and to cover shortfalls in police and firefighter pension plans.
  • State spending increases still would be limited to the rate of inflation and population growth.
  • Referendum D, which would take effect only if approved along with Referendum C, would authorize the state to issue up to $2.1 billion in bonds.
  • Of the total, $1.7 billion would go toward 55 specific road and bridge repair and replacement projects; $175 million toward underfunded police and fire pensions; $147 million toward repairing, maintaining and replacing public schools; and $50 million toward capital improvements to higher education facilities.
  • The measure authorizes the state to retain $100 million a year in revenues that otherwise would be refunded under TABOR. That money would be collected starting in 2011, after the Referendum C TABOR refund suspension expires, and continue until the bonds are repaid.


Do you have a news tip? Do you have questions about a news story? Please contact our staff by phone (970-221-0213) or e-mail.

Events News Archive Home Page About Us Advertising Info Community Page

© North Forty News & Fossil Creek Current 2005
Send your comments and questions to North Forty News & Fossil Creek Current
Web Site designed  by S. Virginia De Herdt, Freelance Writer
Send your comments and questions about this web site to Web Master
Page updated 10/01/2005