RTA could fund road improvements with tax district
By Dan MacArthur
Fossil Creek Current
Related story
Efforts once again are afoot to form a new taxing district to finance
regional transportation improvements within Larimer and Weld counties.
A June 13 transportation summit in Windsor is aimed at bringing together
a broad range of residents to discuss local transportation needs and forge
a grassroots lobby to carry the campaign for voter approval of a Rural
Transportation Authority in the fall of 2007.
RTAs are independent taxing entities authorized by the state to collect
up to a 1 percent sales tax, a $10 annual vehicle registration fee and
a 2 percent lodging tax to finance local transportation improvements over
a duration determined by the participants.
The summit is sponsored by the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning
Organization, an association of 13 local governments collaborating to improve
regional transportation and air quality. The organization plans and prioritizes
which projects in those plans will receive state and federal funding.
The problem, according to executive director Cliff Davidson, is there are
plenty of projects but little money available from those two sources to
meet the region's most pressing transportation priorities anytime soon.
Just over $1 billion in estimated revenues through 2025 would finance about
a third of the state and local transportation needs in this area, according
to the organization.
Those deficiencies will only be compounded, Davidson said, with the inevitably
increasing Front Range population, which he notes grew 144 percent from
1970 to 2000. "The North Front Range is where it's happening," he said.
It became apparent the region was on its own a year ago when all five of
the state's MPOs took their case about the transportation crisis to the
state legislature, Davidson said. They returned home empty handed, except
for a directive to solve the problems themselves by establishing Rural
Transportation Authorities.
"There just is not money from the state to help us with transportation,"
said Fort Collins City Councilman Kurt Kastein. A member of the North Front
Range MPO board, he also serves on a subcommittee working to refine and
resolve differences about the proposed RTA. The committee is composed of
representatives from Fort Collins, Loveland, Greeley and Larimer and Weld
counties.
Davidson readily rants about his objections to RTAs for further "balkanizing"
government by forming yet another layer of bureaucracy. Regardless his
disdain, however, he said RTAs are necessary as "the only game in town"
to generate funding.
Further, he said, "RTAs are appropriate vehicles because they allow regions
to make their own decisions locally about where they're going to invest
their funds."
Davidson said the Pikes Peak region offers a prime example of how RTAs
work well. Voters there in 2004 approved an RTA encompassing El Paso County
and the municipalities of Colorado Springs, Manitou Springs and Green Mountain
Falls. Each collects a 1 percent sales tax with $68 million in annual revenues
dedicated to local transportation construction, maintenance and transit
projects.
The Pikes Peak RTA arose from a two-year endeavor by more than 50 community
organizations and business leaders, building on previous years of effort
by other citizen boards and commissions committed to resolving regional
transportation issues.
"We're following the Colorado Springs script to a T," said Larimer County
Commissioner Karen Wagner, another member of the "big five" RTA subcommittee.
Although following the same script, creating an RTA here is a much more
complex production. The Pikes Peak RTA involved a single county and one
dominant city. Here there are two counties with very different philosophies
and approaches to land use, three major cities competing for all-important
sales tax revenues and eight smaller towns seeking their own slice of the
pie.
Consequently, there are many more issues to resolve. Would a local RTA
finance improvements to state and federal highways such as Interstate 25,
or be limited strictly to local transportation needs, as does the Pikes
Peak RTA? Would individual members be able to opt out should their voters
reject formation of an RTA? What mix of potential revenue sources should
the RTA seek to meet transportation needs? How should those funds be distributed
among members? Should more populous members have greater voting power?
There's obviously plenty of opportunity for conflict. Such differences
of opinion - chiefly between Fort Collins and Loveland on "who ran the
show" - sank a previous proposal for forming an RTA following a two-year
exploration, according to Davidson.
But this time around, Davidson said, it's much more likely the players
can reach agreement with the growing realization that they're all in this
together. Statistics, he said, show that a huge majority of commuters in
the area are driving from homes in one community to jobs in another.
"So in some ways we do have a region," he said.
Wagner agreed that there appears to be more unity, "if you want to call
it that," and that it's important to take a regional approach to transportation.
But she has not yet signed on as a supporter because she believes there's
no consensus on an RTA's purpose.
Her own concerns illustrate just how difficult it will be to reach real
consensus among all potential partners in an RTA. While promoters of pavement
regard more roads as essential for better mobility, Wagner considers the
emphasis on roads shortsighted. She believes connecting the communities
with transit is the best way to prevent them from all growing together.
"Building new roads will create more sprawl, and soon you won't know whether
you're in Greeley, Windsor or Fort Collins," Wagner said. "Every road seems
to be a magnet for new development."
All in all, Wagner said, she harbors real concerns about an RTA. She also
expressed reservations whether the seemingly hurried and "exclusive" summit
staged on a weekday morning will result in the broad-based coalition necessary
to begin rallying support and raising funds for a regional election campaign.
"It's going to have to be carried by people in the private sector," said
Kastein. "Hopefully at the summit we'll get a really good cross section
of community groups."
"There's a long way to go," Wagner said.
"I'm not doubting at this point," said Kastein. "We need to work regionally
on transportation."
|