Will Glade degrade Poudre?
By Cherry Sokoloski
North Forty News
Opinions diverge widely, much like the forks of a river, when it comes
to Glade Reservoir.
Glade and a smaller reservoir, Galeton, are proposed as part of the Northern
Integrated Supply Project which, if built, will supply domestic water to
16 communities and water districts in northern Colorado.
Glade, which would be larger than Horsetooth Reservoir, would be situated
north of Ted's Place and would require moving U.S. Highway 287.
The environmental impact statement for NISP is due out this summer, probably
in July, according to officials at the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District, which is spearheading the project.
One primary point of contention about Glade has been the question of how
diverting water to the reservoir would affect the health of the Cache la
Poudre River. NCWCD officials claim they would be required to protect the
riparian area and the wildlife that depends upon it. Some conservationists
contend that by removing additional water from the Poudre, Glade would
further degrade the river, harming both riparian life and water quality.
There is no question, both sides agree, that there will be less water in
the river if Glade is built. The project would pull water off the river
via two mechanisms: water exchanges with other water users; and the Grey
Mountain water right which, because it's a junior right, would kick in
only during years when there's plenty of water.
Water diverted
To fill Glade, NISP must pull water off the river at the Poudre Valley
Canal, located at the mouth of the Poudre Canyon. To accomplish that, the
partnership proposes exchanging water with other entities that normally
pull water off further downstream and moving those diversions to the Poudre
Valley Canal. In short, water would be diverted further upstream than it
currently is.
As a result, said Carl Brouwer, project manager for NISP, "streamflows
will generally be lower through town." The total difference in water volume
through Fort Collins would be 24,000 to 26,000 acre-feet less per year
because of moving the diversion points. The average total flow in the Poudre
is 280,000 acre-feet per year.
Upstream of the canyon mouth, NISP would not have an effect on streamflow.
The water exchanges would happen with the Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.,
which now diverts water upstream of Shields Street, and the New Cache Irrigation
Co., which takes river water out near Interstate 25. In dry years there
would be no water to exchange, Brouwer noted.
The second mechanism, the Grey Mountain water right, would provide water
to Glade only in certain years and under certain circumstances. NISP is
figuring on an average of 18,000 acre-feet per year from this source. Brouwer
explained that several factors would determine whether this water right
would come into priority: the entire volume of water available during the
runoff period, whether there's a rainy spring, and how full the reservoirs
are from the previous year.
As an example, if all those factors are positive and the Poudre peaks at
3,000 cubic feet per second (the historic average), NISP might be able
to pull off 1,000 cfs during the peak runoff period.
George Varra, Poudre River commissioner, said the only average or better
runoff since 1999 occurred in 2003, when the river peaked at 3,840 cfs.
Peak runoffs have been unusually low in this decade because of the prolonged
drought.
Minimum flow required
Brouwer said NISP would be required to maintain minimum flows at three
locations. At the Bellvue Fish Hatchery, the expected requirement will
be 50 cfs in summer, 25 in winter. At the bridge on North College Avenue
and at the point where the river goes under Prospect Road, requirements
would be 30 cfs both summer and winter.
"It limits us, but that's okay," said Brouwer. "We have to make sure the
riparian area is protected." Brouwer said the NCWCD staff is trying to
find innovative ways to keep as much water as possible in the river as
it flows through Fort Collins. For example, it may be possible to move
a couple of ditch diversion points further downstream.
Brouwer said he also expects the Army Corps of Engineers to require the
creation of a low-flow channel in the river to give fish a place to go
during dry periods. The Army Corps is the agency that decides whether to
give NISP a permit.
While Brouwer has heard from many NISP detractors, he thinks environmentalists
will be "amazed at the depth of analysis and what we're being required
to do" in terms of keeping aquatic and riparian environments healthy.
Sierra Club concerned
Mark Easter, a member of the Poudre Canyon Group of the Sierra Club and
a trained botanist, said the Sierra Club has four principal concerns about
the Glade proposal and the further depletion of the Poudre River, especially
the impact on peak flows. The organization is worried about wetlands along
the river, the riparian forest of cottonwoods and willows, fish habitat
and water quality.
"The peak flows in above-average years are the most important flows for
maintaining the river's health," Easter contended.
Peak flows recharge the wetlands and the groundwater around the wetlands,
he noted, and wetlands are critical for maintaining water quality since
they filter out impurities. Wetlands also provide important wildlife habitat
and recreation areas.
"If you lose the peak flows, you lose the wetlands," Easter said.
The riparian forest is also influenced by peak flows, Easter said. Trees
drop their seeds at the time when water is receding, and they need scoured
ground for the seeds to germinate.
For fish, Easter said, peak flows remove silt, creating spawning beds and
a healthy habitat. Water quality is also affected by peak flows, since
the big rush of water flushes out pollutants.
According to Easter, the local Sierra Club is pushing for two sustainable
solutions to water needs in northern Colorado. First, members advocate
the use of conservation practices by all water users. Second, they would
like to see water users work together to manage the river in such a way
that it can meet people's water needs while restoring the river's health.
"We think it's highly possible" to meet those goals, Easter said.
|