Voters may decide option of five commissioners
By Dan MacArthur
Correspondent
Voters likely will decide whether increasing the number of Larimer County
commissioners is worth the price of a property tax hike.
But the chance of success seems slim considering that neither the commissioners
nor the citizen groups advocating the increase from three to five commissioners
support the proposal as it would appear on a ballot.
"It's intentionally designed for failure," contended Karen Wagner. A candidate
seeking the seat held by Commissioner Tom Bender, she also was a member
of the Citizens for 5 Commissioners.
Two years ago, the group collected 9,500 petition signatures requesting
the commissioners to refer such a proposal to the ballot. After apparently
agreeing to the request, the commissioners reneged after it was too late
for proponents to formally submit the petitions to initiate a vote.
The commissioners forcefully asserted that subsequent research further
confirmed their belief that there is no need to boost the number of commissioners.
"I do not support the five commissioners," said Commissioner Glenn Gibson.
"It's increased government and it makes government less efficient."
"I don't think it will do us any good but I think the citizens should have
that choice," said Bender.
Commissioner Kathay Rennels noted that they agreed to consider putting
the proposal before voters after studying it further and soliciting public
feedback.
"This is what we said we'd do," she said. "I would support asking the people
of Larimer County if they want it, but it needs to be an honest answer."
That's why the commissioners said they could support placing such an issue
on the ballot only if it included a method of funding the estimated $300,000
cost for two new positions. An estimated 0.3 mill property tax increase
would be required to cover salaries and associated costs.
"We're asking departments to justify new positions; I think we need to
ask the same thing of ourselves," Rennels said.
"If we're going to grow government, it needs to pay its own way," agreed
Bender.
But the commissioners refused to support any expansion calling for commissioners
to both represent and be elected from specific geographic districts as
the citizens group and the League of Women Voters of Larimer County favored.
They rejected the league's contention that such a system would improve
voter turnout and connection between constituents and the commissioners.
Contrary to critics' claims that electing commissioners from districts
would lead to better representation, the commissioners contended it would
lead to more parochialism at a time when a regional approach is required.
Currently commissioners must live in one of three districts, but they are
elected by all voters within the county.
"I think it's our jobs as commissioners to look at things countywide,"
said Bender. "I believe as an elected official I represent all the people
in the county."
The commissioners also summarily dismissed as impractical the possibility
of pursuing a home rule form of government. That was one of the other options
analyzed by the state Department of Local Affairs in a May 2003 study examining
alternative governance structures in Larimer County.
Although all three opposed expanding the number of commissioners, Rennels
and Bender voted to put the question to a vote. Gibson was opposed. "We
don't want to let this thing linger on," said Bender.
The commissioners directed their staff to prepare a ballot issue. It first
would ask voters whether the number of commissioners should be increased
from three to five with a corresponding property tax increase of 0.3 mills
to finance such a change.
Next, regardless of how they voted on the first questions, voters would
choose between two options should the expansion be approved. Both would
maintain at-large voting, giving voters across the county the ability to
choose all five commissioners. One would require commissioners to reside
in one of five newly formed commissioner districts. The other would require
commissioners to reside in one of three districts while enabling the election
of two additional commissioners who could live anywhere in the county.
County Manager Frank Lancaster said he expected a draft ballot issue could
be prepared by early July. The commissioners, he said, would have until
the last week of August to decide whether to place it on the ballot.
Wagner protested that the commissioners had intentionally perverted a representation
issue into a tax issue doomed to fail. "I'm sorry you're not listening
to the 9,500 people who signed the petition," she said.
|