Contention remains on airport runway extension
By Dan MacArthur
Fossil Creek Current
A coalition of southeast Fort Collins neighbors will continue pressing
for delay of a proposed runway extension as the master plan update for
the Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport moves toward adoption.
That final draft of the master plan will go before the Fort Collins City
Council for review at a June 27 work session and will be considered for
adoption on July 18. The Loveland City Council is scheduled to consider
adoption of the plan on July 11.
The master plan sets priorities for airport improvements during the next
20 years. The Federal Aviation Administration requires that it be updated
every 10 years for the airport to remain eligible for federal funding.
Dave Gordon, manager of the airport owned jointly by both cities, said
he doubted there would be any changes to the plan prior to its adoption.
"I think what we prepared right now is what we're going to be approving,"
he said. "We've gone through so much public review and comment, I don't
expect to see much change in the plan."
Will Geiger, a member of the Southeast Neighborhoods Association steering
committee, said the group isn't seeking any major changes either, other
than postponing the 1,000-foot runway extension until the cities gather
more information about the need.
"We agree that the airport infrastructure, which has suffered for many
years, needs to be brought up to standard," he stated in an e-mail. "However,
we believe the cities need to gather real data on aircraft traffic, costs
and noise, before committing funds to a runway extension. It should be
pushed out to later in the plan until this data has been developed and
analyzed."
"Other than Allegiant, the need for the longer runway is questionable,"
Geiger stated. "The expenditure of a large amount of money to keep one
airport user happy does not seem to be a financially responsible use of
taxpayer's money."
Regardless the needs of Allegiant Air, which offers flights to Las Vegas,
Gordon said the southern extension is merited to provide a greater safety
margin for fully loaded aircraft during the summer when lift is lessened.
Gordon noted that it would be used only for takeoffs to the south and not
for landings to the north. He said the extension also would not require
any additional development restrictions.
Although the neighbors may fear that the runway would attract more commercial
carriers in addition to Allegiant, Gordon insisted, "The runway extension
does not mean bigger airplanes are coming in."
Geiger said the group agrees there's a need to catch up on routine maintenance
at the airport so it can continue serving as a general aviation facility
in the immediate future. But, he said, the city councils need to consider
whether it's wise to keep making such costly improvements to the Fort Collins-Loveland
Airport. In the long-term, he said, redevelopment of the airport property
may make more sense, especially given increasing discussion of building
a regional airport near Ault.
Gordon dismisses that as an option. "You don't know what you could lose
in the community from not having an airport," he said.
According to Gordon, the airport provides $33 million in direct and indirect
benefits to the region. Besides, he said, most proceeds from the sale of
the airport likely would be returned to the Federal Aviation Administration,
which typically provides most of the financing for airport construction
and improvements.
The plan, according to Gordon, serves only as a prediction of the airport
needs in the next 20 years. "The day it's adopted, it will be out of date
the next day," he said. "It's pretty hard to guess what might happen."
The master plan estimates what Gordon characterized as modest growth for
the airport with total takeoffs and landings increasing from 100,000 annually
now to 180,000 in 20 years and aircraft based at the airport increasing
from 220 to 280.
|