Water supply pipeline ready for EIS review
By JoAn Bjarko
North Forty News
A water supply idea first publicized two years ago--piping water from
the Green River in Wyoming to Colorado's thirsty Front Range--crossed
two hurdles in November.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers confirmed that it has retained a third-party
contractor to work on the environmental impact statement for the Regional
Watershed Supply Project proposed by Aaron Million, a north Fort Collins
resident.
Million also told the North Forty News that he recently signed an agreement
with a publicly traded leading manufacturer of pipelines to provide financial
capital and professional expertise for the proposed project. Million said
the agreement was worth "several million dollars" but declined to disclose
the name of the company.
Jim Winters, special assistant in the operations division for the Corps'
Omaha District, said the EIS is still in the "early stages." He noted that
the Million Conservation Resource Group will have to pay for the studies
needed for the EIS.
Million is optimistic that review of the water supply project will go smoothly,
which means a time frame of up to three years. He anticipated that the
draft EIS will be out for public comment in early 2010 and that the Corps
could issue a decision by fall 2011.
Million is relying on the Colorado River Compact that allocated an average
of 7.5 million acre-feet of water annually to four upper basin states--
Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico. The three lower basin states--
Nevada, Arizona and California--also are allocated 7.5 million acre-feet,
and Mexico is allocated 1.5 million acre-feet of water through the compact.
An acre-foot is the amount of water required to cover one acre a foot deep.
Those allocations, however, are dependent on the Colorado River Basin producing
about 16.5 million acre-feet a year, a concept that has some experts worried
because the water estimate was made in 1922. The Flaming Gorge Reservoir
straddling the Wyoming-Utah border, which can store up to 3.8 million acre-feet
of water, also is key to the compact.
Among the upper basin states, Colorado is supposed to get 51.75 percent
of the water produced. Million is convinced that there is plenty of untapped
supply for a new 400-mile pipeline to bring that water to the east side
of Colorado. The cost is estimated at $2 billion to $3 billion, and it
could deliver about 200,000 acre-feet of water, according to Million.
"There are no legal or institutional policy constraints that would prevent
this project from moving forward," he said.
If the water reaches eastern Colorado, Million said, it could benefit agriculture
and municipalities as far south as Pueblo. "Rather than dewatering river
systems on the Front Range, this water supply could actually enhance those
flows directly and through exchanges," he said, listing the Poudre, South
Platte and Arkansas rivers.
For example, Million said, the pipeline could deliver water to Glade Reservoir
if it were built, thereby avoiding the need to take water out of the Poudre
River. Million added that he would not weigh in on whether the proposed
Glade Reservoir north of LaPorte is a good project.
The Green River, with headwaters on the western side of the Continental
Divide in the Wind River Mountain Range, is the chief tributary of the
Colorado River. Million's water supply concept comes at a time when residents
of the Western Slope are becoming increasingly anxious about the number
of proposals to divert even more water from the Colorado River to the growing
cities to the east.
Among the upper basin states, Wyoming also has not yet fully developed
its share of the basin, which is 14 percent.
Harry LaBonde, deputy state engineer for Wyoming, noted that a number of
studies say there is unappropriated water in the Green River basin. "In
most years, there appears to be water available to Colorado in the Green
River," he said, adding that Wyoming also wants to make sure that it can
fully develop its apportionment.
Million has filed for two permits with the State Engineer's Office, LaBonde
said, one to divert water out of the Green River and one to use the same
pipeline for water use in Wyoming. Both are under review, he said. Wyoming's
permitting process does not require an EIS, he said, but the state will
be very interested in the outcome of the EIS launched by the Army Corps.
While Million is leaning toward a diversion directly from the Green River
before it flows into Flaming Gorge Reservoir, he has also requested a water
supply contract from the Bureau of Reclamation to take water out of the
reservoir.
From either diversion point, the pipeline would follow the Interstate 80
corridor across Wyoming, possibly fill drought-impacted Lake Hattie west
of Laramie, and continue toward Cheyenne. The pipeline would likely travel
south between Fort Collins and Greeley, or even east of Greeley to the
E-470 corridor and on to Parker, Colorado Springs and Pueblo, according
to Jim Eddy, who is working with Million on strategy.
"The intent is to try to use existing utility corridors as much as possible,"
Eddy said.
The underground pipeline could be 75 to 115 inches in diameter. Where needed,
natural gas-fired turbines would provide power for pumping, and there are
some locations along the route that could produce hydroelectric power,
Eddy said.
"Our goal is to make it as efficient as possible," he said.
If the pipeline gets all required permits, Million envisions a cooperative
effort for financing, which might include using the blended bonding authorities
of water districts, municipalities and others who want to buy water. Water
delivery contracts could also push conservation methods, he said.
Million and Eddy, who have been friends since junior high school, see the
Regional Watershed Supply Project as a benefit on numerous fronts - environmental,
recreational, agricultural and municipal.
"The critical piece is collaboration," Eddy said. "The opportunities are
there."
|